<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reckon &#187; magic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reckon.ws/wp/tag/magic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reckon.ws/wp</link>
	<description>The whole world&#039;s a stage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Explaining the magic of consciousness with one word</title>
		<link>http://reckon.ws/wp/explaining-the-magic-of-consciousness-with-one-word.htm</link>
		<comments>http://reckon.ws/wp/explaining-the-magic-of-consciousness-with-one-word.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>reckon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reckon.ws/wp/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dennett argues that the &#8216;hard problem&#8216; is a red herring &#8211; the whole question of how conscious first person experience arises from the biological function of the brain assumes that consciousness is a single thing that needs explaining. He suggests that there isn&#8217;t a single thing that is consciousness, just a collection of mental components, [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://reckon.ws/wp/frame-analysis-on-the-word-stage.htm' rel='bookmark' title='Frame analysis on the word stage'> <small><span><span><span><span>Frame analysis reveals the complexity of mundane social activities  and it brings out the arbitrary nature of any fixed, social-domain or activity-based  dichotomy between what is "staged" and what is "real". It brings out the reality-constructing  capacities of what is staged, but also the staged nature of the everyday tangibly real.  Note in this respect for instance that mass-media communication - including especially  the solidly real called "news broadcasting" - is saturated by frame laminations  which are deliberately and purposefully staged. What's more, an understanding of media communication  is rather hard to arrive at, unless one comes to terms with the constructed pretense of an absence of  mediation and the audiences' routine submission to an illusion of direct communication -  even in situations where such a pretense becomes extremely hard to sustain...</span></span></span></span>

via <a title="What is meant by discourse analysis?" href="http://bank.ugent.be/da/da.htm#eg" target="_blank">Stef Slembrouck | What is meant by discourse analysis?</a></small></a></li><li><a href='http://reckon.ws/wp/google-and-the-power-of-words.htm' rel='bookmark' title='Google and the power of words'> <small><strong>The dominance of Google is radically changing written language on the internet - through their search engine and advertising programmes such as AdSense they are homogenising the meanings of words. This provides a strong impetus for newspapers to ignore whatever editorial ethics they had left in their desperate rush towards the money from online advertising. </strong>

Article continues <a title="How Google is changing language..." href="http://blog.lovehowlmuse.com/2008/07/29/how-google-is-changing-language-and-how-the-telegraph-lost-its-soul/" target="_blank">here</a>.

via <a title="(s)word" href="http://blog.lovehowlmuse.com/2008/07/29/how-google-is-changing-language-and-how-the-telegraph-lost-its-soul/" target="_blank">(s)word | The LoveHowlMuse Blog</a></small></a></li><li><a href='http://reckon.ws/wp/the-extension-we-call-the-net.htm' rel='bookmark' title='The extension we call the net'> <small>The extension we call the net, the grid, the Infobahn, is more than the sum of its parts, it may perchance lead to an actual organizing principle of reality itself. An organizing principle somewhat akin to an operating system, yet directed, and multidimensional, interactive and intelligent.

—Wildcat: <a title="Wildcat via Space Collective" href="http://spacecollective.org/Wildcat/4018/Mind-Habitat-the-quest-for-a-home" target="_blank">Mind Habitat, the quest for a home</a></small></a></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennett argues that the &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_problem_of_consciousness">hard problem</a>&#8216; is a red herring &#8211; the whole question of how conscious first person experience arises from the biological function of the brain assumes that consciousness is a single thing that needs explaining.</p>
<p>He suggests that there isn&#8217;t a single thing that is consciousness, just a collection of mental components, but the fact we&#8217;ve named it as a single thing fools us.</p>
<p>In his article <a title="PDF:  explaining the magic of consciousness" href="http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/explainingmagic.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Explaining the &#8220;Magic&#8221; of Consciousness</em></a>, he gives a great analogy of how the use of the word <strong>&#8216;the&#8217;</strong> was used in a card trick to make it seem completely mysterious even to fellow professional magicians.</p>
<p>Article continues <a title="Mind Hackers" href="http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2008/07/dennett_on_magic_and.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>via <a title="Mind Hackers" href="http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2008/07/dennett_on_magic_and.html" target="_blank">Mind Hackers</a>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Freckon.ws%2Fwp%2Fexplaining-the-magic-of-consciousness-with-one-word.htm"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Freckon.ws%2Fwp%2Fexplaining-the-magic-of-consciousness-with-one-word.htm&amp;source=Reckon&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" title="Explaining The Magic Of Consciousness With One Word" alt=" Explaining the magic of consciousness with one word" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://reckon.ws/wp/frame-analysis-on-the-word-stage.htm' rel='bookmark' title='Frame analysis on the word stage'> <small><span><span><span><span>Frame analysis reveals the complexity of mundane social activities  and it brings out the arbitrary nature of any fixed, social-domain or activity-based  dichotomy between what is "staged" and what is "real". It brings out the reality-constructing  capacities of what is staged, but also the staged nature of the everyday tangibly real.  Note in this respect for instance that mass-media communication - including especially  the solidly real called "news broadcasting" - is saturated by frame laminations  which are deliberately and purposefully staged. What's more, an understanding of media communication  is rather hard to arrive at, unless one comes to terms with the constructed pretense of an absence of  mediation and the audiences' routine submission to an illusion of direct communication -  even in situations where such a pretense becomes extremely hard to sustain...</span></span></span></span>

via <a title="What is meant by discourse analysis?" href="http://bank.ugent.be/da/da.htm#eg" target="_blank">Stef Slembrouck | What is meant by discourse analysis?</a></small></a></li><li><a href='http://reckon.ws/wp/google-and-the-power-of-words.htm' rel='bookmark' title='Google and the power of words'> <small><strong>The dominance of Google is radically changing written language on the internet - through their search engine and advertising programmes such as AdSense they are homogenising the meanings of words. This provides a strong impetus for newspapers to ignore whatever editorial ethics they had left in their desperate rush towards the money from online advertising. </strong>

Article continues <a title="How Google is changing language..." href="http://blog.lovehowlmuse.com/2008/07/29/how-google-is-changing-language-and-how-the-telegraph-lost-its-soul/" target="_blank">here</a>.

via <a title="(s)word" href="http://blog.lovehowlmuse.com/2008/07/29/how-google-is-changing-language-and-how-the-telegraph-lost-its-soul/" target="_blank">(s)word | The LoveHowlMuse Blog</a></small></a></li><li><a href='http://reckon.ws/wp/the-extension-we-call-the-net.htm' rel='bookmark' title='The extension we call the net'> <small>The extension we call the net, the grid, the Infobahn, is more than the sum of its parts, it may perchance lead to an actual organizing principle of reality itself. An organizing principle somewhat akin to an operating system, yet directed, and multidimensional, interactive and intelligent.

—Wildcat: <a title="Wildcat via Space Collective" href="http://spacecollective.org/Wildcat/4018/Mind-Habitat-the-quest-for-a-home" target="_blank">Mind Habitat, the quest for a home</a></small></a></li></ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reckon.ws/wp/explaining-the-magic-of-consciousness-with-one-word.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>-1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
